Uncategorized

Past, present and future projects at SportsMyriad and beyond

Getting personal for a bit, though it’s also about the state of this blog …

If ever there was a day to question my life, it was today. The B-52s and Squeeze were playing 2.5 miles from my house. I drove past twice on a parent-related errand. What the heck am I doing with my life? Why am I driving past two great bands for some humdrum suburban activity?

But when I left USA TODAY two years ago, it wasn’t to see the B-52s and Squeeze. It was family time. It was project time.

Then some terrific opportunities came along. I wrote a lot for USA TODAY’s magazine group. And espnW called out of the blue and offered me some Women’s World Cup work in Germany. That turned into about nine months of truly rewarding reporting in women’s soccer.

This year, WPS is gone. And the Olympics is a different animal.

If I had my way, I’d be boarding a plane for London sometime in the next few days. I don’t think I have to do much more to prove that you can drop me anywhere Olympians are competing, and I’ll come back with good stories both expected and unexpected. (And to think I hadn’t even put “interview the president of Iceland” on my bucket list.)

But alas, I’m not going. I’m not even working for employers I might have expected one or two years ago. I can list several reasons why that happened. Freelance money has dried up in a few places. Other places aren’t so willing to jump through the hoops for freelancers to travel. One situation was either a simple misunderstanding or malignant neglect, and it’s not really worth it for me to figure out which it was. And it’s not all on the employers — I wasn’t willing to consider an extended gig so I could make the trip. Go back to the first reason for leaving USA TODAY: “family time.” We can swing a couple of weeks away. Anything else is pushing it.

So that’s what I’m not doing this summer. That leads to the question I’ve heard a few times in recent days: “You’re doing what?”

Four things, and they all deserve some explanation:

1. Trapit. (see trap.it) Coincidentally, my new robot overlords got a bit of pub today with the release of their iPad app. I’ve seen a few descriptions of the service — “a hybrid between a search engine and a recommendation site” is in the link I just posted — but I think of it as a really, really intelligent search engine. Ideally, you’ll set up search terms — or “traps” — and you’ll get the best/most recent stuff available without all the nonsense you get in more general searches. It’s almost like Pandora for the whole Web. You say what interests you, and that gets refined as you use your electronic thumbs. My work here (temporary, through the Olympics) will be somewhat behind the scenes, but I’m pleased with it, and it’s a good use of my expertise.

2. Bleacher Report (see the Hope Solo story). The reputation may be “anything goes.” But B/R has taken some big steps, especially the hiring of the most excellent King Kaufman to spread some journalistic wisdom among the contributors, toward getting its content to be as solid as its site architecture and search-engine optimization. (Those big terms basically mean the site is really easy to use, and its stories pop up a lot at Google.) My first impressions of the organization from the inside are overwhelmingly positive.

And the bottom line is this: They want to do the Olympics right. I want to do the Olympics right. Any questions?

3. Popdose (see the Tour de France story). This is basically a community of people who are really far too cool to be hanging out with sports journalists. But they let me write for them anyway, and I hope to take them up on the invitation from time to time.

4. SportsMyriad. You don’t have to be named Alanis to find this ironic: While I’m getting all this other work with intense deadlines, my dear old blog has taken off. But that’s good.

I plan to segue into Phase 2 of this blog after the Games. I’d like to bring on some contributors to serve two goals: Give readers one-stop shopping for all the niche sports that are undercovered elsewhere, and give writers a chance to develop and show off their expertise. I’ve noticed over the last couple of years that Soccer By Ives has helped a few upstart reporters get some exposure, and I’d love to do that here to find the next great gymnastics or curling writer. Maybe I’ll even get some veterans who are willing to write for exposure.

Or (and?) maybe I’ll actually try to monetize this thing beyond the Amazon and Google links.

In any case — yes, I’ll be getting back to the medal projections in the morning. Five more to go, and then I can update the big table. And get some sleep.

And then finish my danged book on The Ultimate Fighter. If you have a message from me about that, don’t think you’re off the hook.

medal projections, olympic sports

2012 medal projection update: Sailing

Did you know that the world sailing federation shares its initials with NATO’s International Security Assistance Force?

The unarmed version of the ISAF has a good list of qualified sailors, and you can look back at the World Championships, held late last year in Perth, that qualified most of those sailors after the original picks were made. They also have rankings. And sailing also has separate world championships for each class. (When we say “Worlds” in these picks, we mean the big “Worlds” in Perth. We’ll mention the class championships separately; e.g., “49er Worlds.” We’re putting more stock in the big “Worlds” because they were the primary Olympic qualifier, so there were really no excuses.)

Into the ocean we go …

Continue reading

medal projections, olympic sports

2012 medal projection update: Modern pentathlon and triathlon

Holding a world championship in an Olympic year always seems a little redundant. And we really don’t know if we can peg someone a favorite for being in peak form in the Big Show a couple of months before the Really Big Show.

That’s the case in modern pentathlon, but in addition to the 2012 Worlds, we also have world rankings to consider, as well as the 2011 Worlds, which were moved from Cairo to Moscow last year.

Triathlon just keeps going and going, with athletes picking up ranking points. They tell us not only who has the most points but who only needed a couple of races to get them. The federation is also kind enough to give us updated start lists.

Check the previous picks for both sports. And away we go …

Continue reading

medal projections, olympic sports

2012 medal projection update: Judo

Quick aside to MMA fans: We’re probably not looking for the next Ronda Rousey here. Not many people are that good at landing the armbar and marketing themselves. But maybe the next Rick Hawn? Dude’s doing pretty well in Bellator.

In any case, the USA has someone who can do even better than Rousey in Olympic judo — Kayla Harrison, the 2010 world champion.

Check out the previous picks and some rankings — the Olympic qualification rankings and the overlapping current world rankings, which will tell you the World Championship results in very small type. Or you could just check the World Championship results in a separate window.

Now see if you can figure out who actually made the teams. Countries with more than one qualifier had to pick one somehow. In the process of trying to figure it out, I stumbled into a great not-quite-safe-for-work Uncyclopedia entry that explains the brutality of judo: “You are never unarmed when you can hit someone with a planet.” You could also check the European Judo Federation, where you’ll see headlines like “Europe example of good refereeing.”

But finally — we’re rescued! The International Judo Federation tells us who’s in!

Off we go, and remember that they award two bronze medals in each weight class.

Continue reading

cycling, olympic sports

Schleck’s doping case joins “all news is bad news” file

From the AP story on Frank Schleck testing positive (preliminary — B sample still to come) for a diuretic at the Tour de France:

The case is also likely to cast new doubt on cycling’s ability to root out drugs cheats despite vigorous controls put in place by the UCI and its allies in the anti-doping fight.

How so? Someone failed a test. Next question: Was he cheating by using a diuretic to mask other stuff, or was this an accident? Investigation and punishment to come.

You know what would “cast new doubt on cycling’s ability to root out drugs cheats”? Someone skating through the whole Tour de France, then turning around and saying, “Ha ha! I just did this whole tour on a cocktail of EPO, anabolic steroids and ecstasy! BOO-yeah!”

But a positive test for a diuretic “casting doubt”? That’s like seeing a bug crash into your window screen and saying, “Oh no, I guess the screen isn’t working.”

medal projections, olympic sports

2012 medal projection update: Gymnastics

To do truly accurate gymnastics projections, we’d probably need spies in small gyms in China, Romania, Russia and elsewhere. We can’t do that, so we’ll just go with the 2011 World Championships and whatever we had from the previous list.

In women’s gymnastics, that means we’ll have near-total turnover. Few gymnasts last multiple Olympic cycles, and this time, we’ve seen world champions from 2-3 years ago fall far back. The USA had several gymnasts attempt comebacks, but the young guns are just too good.

Men’s gymnasts have a bit more longevity, so we have more competitions from which to choose. We’re a little more confident about those picks. Maybe.

(Update: I’m going to plug this informative gymnastics blog that is tracking each country’s participants through all the nagging injuries and team selection dramas.)

On to the rings, bars, ribbons, trampolines and horses (not the equestrian kind) …

Continue reading

medal projections, olympic sports

2012 medal projection update: Equestrian

Je pense que les websites d’equestrian sont ecrit par les personnes confuses ou sadique.

(I think that means “I think equestrian websites are written by confused or sadistic people.”)

Here’s what we said last year. Here are the rankings. Here we go …

Individual dressage: The Netherlands have the legendary Anky van Grunsven, top-ranked Adelinde Cornelissen and Edward Gal. The next seven on the list are German or British. American Steffen Peters is 16th and 17th (on two different horses). The rest of the U.S. team: Tina Konyot, Jan Ebeling and Adrienne Lyle. We’ll stick with the original projection: Netherlands, Germany, Netherlands

Team dressage: No reason to change here, either: Netherlands, Germany, Britain

Individual jumping: The top three in the rankings have only shuffled slightly — Sweden’s Rolf-Goran Bengtsson, France’s Kevin Staut, Canada’s Eric Lamaze (tied with Switzerland’s Pius Schwizer). The U.S. squad: Beezie Madden, McLain Ward, Rich Fellers, Reed Kessler. Madden, the 2008 bronze medalist, is the only one in the top 20.  We’ll stick with the original picks once again: Sweden, France, Canada

Team jumping: Nearly changed this one to put Britain in the medals. Nope. The USA may not have many riders at the very top, but the team has plenty of depth. Still the same: Germany, France, USA

Individual eventing: The USA has a full five-member team — Karen O’Connor, Boyd Martin, Phillip Dutton, Tiana Coudray and Will Coleman. Martin’s ranked third, Dutton fourth, O’Connor 23rd. That bodes well for the team event but also gives the USA a legit shot at an individual medal. Again. The three non-Americans in the top five were in the top three in the World Equestrian Games: top-ranked William Fox-Pitt (Britain), Andrew Nicholson (New Zealand) and Michael Jung (Germany). New Zealand has a second rider ranked sixth, and we like strength in numbers in these picks. Projection was GBR-GER-NZL; now Britain, New Zealand, USA

Team eventing: After the six riders mentioned above, we have four Australians. Britain, Germany and the USA also have considerable depth. We’ll leave this projection alone: Britain, Germany, Australia