soccer

Single-Digit Soccer: Great moments in halftime speeches

Here’s my attempt to make sure my players didn’t get caught up in any unsportsmanlike antics yesterday (my comments in bold; the rest are from various kids):

So we’re all going to be cool, OK? Like Fonzie. What’s Fonzie like?

(blank stares)

You all don’t know Fonzie, do you?

No.

Wait, is he a Muppet?

Fonzie’s really … cool … OK?

No, he’s not a Muppet!

He’s a cool Muppet?

Which Muppet is he?

No, no — he’s not a Muppet.

Are you sure?

Is he the chicken Muppet?

No, Fonzie was on Happy Days.

What’s Happy Days?

Happy Days was a TV show with Fonzie.

A Muppet was on Happy Days?

No — FOZZIE is the Muppet.

Oh.

Is he supposed to be funny?

Yes. And he’s the bear, not the chicken.

I thought he was supposed to be cool.

Wait, you want us to be like the bear?

OK, let’s start over …

I thought about trying to explain the Pulp Fiction reference, but I didn’t want to shock any parents.

soccer

Borislow unleashes anger at U.S. Soccer

Former magicJack owner Dan Borislow has been conciliatory toward other WPS alumni. Their lawsuit is settled, and everyone’s moving forward.

But he still sees an obstruction in the path of women’s soccer, and it’s the organization that collects the sanctioning fees. Here’s his statement:

My take on the whole matter is that WPS could have made it if the USSF granted money to the league instead of charge it. I have never understood why the most successful team and players representing the United States in the last 10 years are not taken care of like the national treasure they are. Why is Pia (Sundhage, the U.S. women’s coach) not extended a contract and make 20 times less money than the head coach of our men’s national team (Jurgen Klinsmann)?* Why wasn’t the USSF more involved in helping form and run a successful Women’s Division 1 league?

In the future, the USSF needs to give MLS an annual grant so they can run a women’s league. Right now the largest sport we have for kids and Women can’t get a few million dollars from the wealthiest country in the world and their governing body. It’s disgraceful. Billions here, billions there and not a couple million for the best team representing our country.

If you have to point fingers — in this case there is a guilty party, that is where you point them. But not these owners who put up the money and tried the best they knew how. Fire these morons running the USSF and replace them with somebody who understands the value and importance of girls and women playing soccer in the United States. They shouldn’t even be invited to the Olympics.

U.S. Soccer would argue that it pays the national team players pretty well. But it’s safe to say the organization hasn’t been pro-active about getting a women’s soccer league running. Is that their role?

Quick historical precedents: In 1993, U.S. Soccer solicited bids for a new men’s professional Division I league, and veteran U.S. Soccer officials were involved with the winning bid, MLS. And in 2010, U.S. Soccer administered a men’s Division II league, forcibly (and temporarily) merging the USL’s top tier and the nascent NASL.

* – Technically, Klinsmann makes 13 times what Sundhage makes, but the point is taken.

soccer

Boston Breakers statement on WPS

I’ll have more analysis at some point over the weekend, in case my story and analysis at espnW aren’t enough for you.

But I wanted to go ahead and pass this along from my inbox …

May 18, 2012 (NORWOOD, MA) – Women’s Professional Soccer (WPS) further announces today that the efforts of all teams over the past six months have regrettably lead to the conclusion that the league cannot continue forward despite the efforts of all teams. MagicJack did everything possible to try and keep the league together and succeed as well. MagicJack helped keep the league alive in 2011. Unfortunately, collectively the ownership could not reconcile their differences about how to run the league and what the appropriate financial model for teams should be for sustainability and jointly made the decision to cease operations.

Boston Breakers’ managing partner, Michael Stoller, stated “Dan Borislow built a terrific team that created a great level of fan support and created a strong attendance boost after the World Cup ended for the league and each team. I know many players on the MagicJack team were very happy and would love to play for Dan again in the future. Unfortunately, collectively we decided that the number of issues we faced as a league, along with the overall economic considerations, were just too much to overcome presently.”

Thoughts?

soccer

D.C. United Women and Boston Breakers: A W-League/WPSL friendly

The leagues may have a fractious history, but second-year W-League club D.C. United Women welcomed the WPSL Elite League’s Boston Breakers (formerly of the WUSA and WPS) to the Maryland SoccerPlex on Saturday.

Play was a little ragged, as you might expect from one team (D.C.) that barely had time for introductions and another (Boston) that is still very much in early-season form. And as you’d expect, the professional team with a bit more preseason practice and a game under its belt (Boston) had the better of play and won 1–0.

But D.C. United Women had a few good moments as well as some sensational play on defense and in goal.

I caught a few highlights on video and spoke with many of the players.

Crowd wasn’t bad — definitely 1,000, maybe more — on a beautiful night.

soccer

Paul Riley’s WPS supergroup

I don’t have anything profound to add — just wanted to share the list of players that I received via press release, and it’s a little too long for Twitter.

This group is training with Riley this week and will participate in Headers for Hope, a charity tournament.

Player (Current team/previous team)
Michelle Betos NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/Boston Breakers (WPS)
Estelle Johnson NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Nikki Krzysik NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Brittany Taylor NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/Sky Blue FC (WPS)
Jen Buczkowski Chicago Red Stars (WPSL Elite)/Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Allie Long NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/Paris Saint-Germain (France)/ Sky Blue FC (WPS)
Tina DiMartino NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/ Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Merritt Mattias NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/ Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Kelsey Hood New England Mutiny (WPSL Elite)
Sinead Farrelly Ottawa Fury (WPSL Elite)/ Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Meghan Lencyk Ottawa Fury (W League)/Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Jasmine Spencer NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Jazmyne Avant NY Fury (WPSL Elite)/ Philadelphia Independence (WPS)
Ashley Grove Rochester Ravens (W-League)
Kaitlyn Ryan, Villanova/Ottawa Fury (W-League)
Amanda Forrester, UNLV
Claire Zimmick, Boston Breakers (WPS)
Jess Hopton, LaSalle
Michele Dalton, U of Wisconsin

soccer

Single-Digit Soccer: The parity problem

Sports are inherently meritocracies. At some point, you simply can’t make every player equal.

When I scan the U8 league for the season ahead, I see quite a mixture. A lot of kids have been playing indoor soccer together in the winter. Then you have the kids with everything ranging from a general indifference about soccer to actual developmental challenges.

So are these players evenly scattered across the league? Well, not exactly.

I don’t think there’s anything nefarious going on. Sure, I’ve heard a few stories in various clubs in which crafty parents and coaches gamed the system to put together their eventual U9 travel killers as early as U7 or U6. Even in those cases, I can’t really complain. Some parents and children are simply more serious about soccer, and they’re going to be more comfortable playing with other families who feel the same way. In other cases, the basic geographical spread still kicks up an uneven talent pool — for some reason, a couple of local elementary schools have families that are really into the game and others do not. Some neighborhoods have affinities for hockey or baseball that take the kids play one season a year rather than three (fall outdoor, winter indoor, spring outdoor).

That poses two challenges:

1. Keeping the games fun. The slaughter rule helps — if a team is getting crushed, we’ll run an extra player onto the field. Then there’s the other question: If you have a big enough league where the teams don’t all play each other, do you keep the loaded teams away from the inexperienced teams?

I’m torn, frankly. The good players on the inexperienced teams would surely enjoy the opportunity. But I think it has to be an occasional thing. Week-in, week-out, you’d have to have some variety.

2. Making sure all kids have an equal shot at travel opportunities. This is trickier. Once a club’s staff realizes that Coach X’s team is really good, it’s easy to think of that team as the future travel pool.

I have to remind myself that U9 travel doesn’t set anything in stone. Some players blossom late. Some coaches may suddenly notice that a U11 player in the house league has been overlooked. Right now, we’re still playing “mobball” to some extent, and a skilled but smallish player who shies away from the mob isn’t going to shine in games until teams get the hang of spreading the field.

And I think our club is doing a lot of things right in opening up other opportunities. We have all sorts of “academy” programs for kids who might want more coaching than I can offer while I’m herding cats. That’s also a great opportunity to be sure the club staff has seen them in action. All I can do is keep reminding the parents that these programs exist.

Aside from that, I’m just getting some practice plans ready with the help of the U.S. Soccer youth curriculum. So at age 8, we’re supposed to be playing 7×7, but we’re not supposed to teach tactics. Um …

soccer

Recapping the WPS-Borislow case

Someone asked recently if I could put all the WPS-Borislow documents in one place. I also find myself sometimes wanting to go back and check a few things, and I’m sure a couple of the diehards following everything also want to see it all together. So with apologies to those who just want this all to be over with, here goes:

You can get a list of the documents from the Palm Beach County clerk’s site. They say it’s only set up to work in Internet Explorer, but I was able to get it to load in Chrome as well. Here’s the direct link to the case.

Continue reading

soccer

Judge cuts Borislow’s discovery request in half, but WPS’s to-do list is long

This order, released with no fanfare March 9 and not posted to the court site until a few days later, is one of the simplest documents in the long saga of Dan Borislow’s court case against WPS. It boils down to one sentence:

The Court overrules Defendant’s Specific Objections as to Requests No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and the Court sustains as to Defendant’s Specific Objections to Requests No. 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.

The document has the feel of something that was rushed. For one thing, the second “as to” in that sentence is misplaced. For another, if you look at Page 2, the identifier at the top says “Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Injunction, Page 2 of 11.” This is not an order granting such a motion — to my knowledge, no such order has been made, and the original injunction request is hardly the issue any more — and the document is two pages, not 11.

Here’s the order in question:

In case you hadn’t memorized Requests 1-10, check WPS’s prior motion. This is actually two documents combined; start on p. 3 of the second one, with the header SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS:

I’ve had to re-read the order multiple times to be sure I’m reading it correctly. WPS has to produce the following:

  1. All documents relating to the decision to suspend the 2012 season.
  2. All documents relating to the proposed settlement, including “Defendant’s decision not to comply with settlement terms.”
  3. All documents relating to efforts to resume play in 2013.
  4. All documents relating to the Jan. 30 press release in which the league announced it was suspending the season, including drafts, markups, etc.
  5. All documents relating to the Jan. 30 media conference call — basically, whatever notes WPS CEO Jennifer O’Sullivan and board chairman Fitz Johnson had.

Then the judge sustains WPS’s objection to discovery on the distribution of Borislow’s bond money for the 2012 season.

As always, lawyers’ input is welcome. But this discovery seems to be less about settling the dispute and more about deciding whether WPS was operating in bad faith when league officials negotiated with Borislow in January.

For a league that has already said its legal fees (which are NOT subject to discovery) and this ongoing court case had choked out the 2012 season and threatened its continued existence, this ruling surely isn’t a welcome development.