olympic sports, soccer

Tinkering with the 2012 WPS calendar

Big, big issue here. The World Cup took a lot of players away from WPS for a long time this year, and magicJack owner Dan Borislow was none too pleased.

Next year could be even worse. The Olympic final is Aug. 9. Assuming WPS doesn’t want to hold its playoffs without national team players, we have three general options:

  1. Wrap up the season in late June, before national team camps.
  2. Force national team players to return quickly and hold playoffs on the same schedule as this season: Aug. 15, Aug. 18, Aug. 25.
  3. Run the season into September.

Let’s run through a few questions first. I’ll give short answers that might be debatable.

How early do national team players need to leave? This season, the U.S. players left earlier than others, playing their final WPS games May 28. Players from Canada and Sweden played for Western New York on June 3. Players from England, Brazil and New Zealand stuck around until June 12. Japan’s Aya Sameshima made a cameo appearance for Boston that weekend, and given her team’s World Cup victory, it’s difficult to argue that the extra time in the States ruined her preparations.

So the U.S. players spent a full four weeks with the national team before the World Cup. That’s on top of the training they did at other times during the season. But that’s comparable to the U.S. men in 2010, who left their MLS teams after their May 15 games, played the first of their warmup friendlies on May 25, and kicked off in the World Cup on June 12.

European players actually spent a little longer with their clubs. The Champions League final was May 22. The gap between that game and the World Cup still far exceeded the FIFA regulation (PDF): 14 days.

Realistically, assume three or four weeks before the start of the Olympics. The first soccer games are July 25, so playing games through June 30-July 1 should be reasonable.

After the Aug. 9 final, players can physically make it back for midweek games Aug. 15, but they might not be fully recharged and reconnected with their teams until Aug. 25 or so.

SHORT ANSWER: Gone from July 2 to Aug. 15, with players easing back into WPS teams after that.

Can WPS play in September or later? In 2009 and 2011, the league wrapped up by the end of August. That’s an advantage for players who have coaching jobs during the school year. But the 2010 season, which ran through September, didn’t see an exodus of players leaving WPS teams for their coaching jobs.

The media landscape in the fall is jammed with football (the American kind). But Major League Soccer still has good crowds through the gridiron months. Getting space in a print newspaper is one thing, but as we’re often told (especially by DuNord), soccer is the sport of the Internet.

SHORT ANSWER: Yes.

How many games will national team players miss? I heard Philly coach Paul Riley say national team players might be around for only eight of 20 games next season, but I’m hoping I misheard him. There’s simply no reason for that. None whatsoever.

WPS did take a couple of weeks off this season, though a rescheduled game got in the way of a clean break. The Olympics are nearly a week shorter than the World Cup, and national teams shouldn’t need a prolonged “getting to know you” period. If WPS takes two weeks off out of the six weekends that players will be gone, there’s no reason for players to miss more than four games.

SHORT ANSWER: Four, at most.

How many games should WPS teams play? This one is tricky. In 2009, teams played 20. In 2010, they played 24. This year, 18.

That’s comparable to European leagues, though top teams in those leagues also have Champions League games on the schedule. Germany and France play 22. England started with 14 this year.

From a developmental point of view, players need more games. But the national team players will get more games throughout the year. For the rest of the WPS talent pool, there’s no reason teams can’t play friendlies during the Olympic break or elsewhere during the season. Maybe even take a longer Olympic break to play teams from the WPSL, W-League and NCAA.

SHORT ANSWER: 16 might be enough during a year with a World Cup or Olympic competition. No reason not to build back to 20 or more in 2013.

So let’s flesh out the schedule options:

OPTION 1: END SEASON BEFORE OLYMPICS

Working backwards, that means playoff games (assuming the same playoff format) June 20, June 23 and June 30. Regular season ends June 16.

Now let’s say we’ll play a short season of 16 games, condensed into 14 weeks. First games: March 17. Maybe play the first two weeks in southern venues.

OPTION 2: END SEASON RIGHT AFTER OLYMPICS

Playoffs Aug. 15, Aug. 18, Aug. 25. With a two-week Olympic break, the season would look pretty much like this season did, running from April 7 to Aug. 11. With two fewer games in our proposed schedule, we’d have fewer two-game weeks.

Without a two-week break, the league would have 19 weeks, certainly enough for 18 games.

OPTION 3: END SEASON IN SEPTEMBER

Four games in April, four in May, five in June (five weekends), two in July — that’s 15 before the Olympic break. Perhaps the Olympic break could be three weeks, still allowing plenty of time for 14 games at a leisurely game-a-week pace with no midweek games needed.

Restart with regular season games Aug. 18 and 25 to wrap a 16-game season and reintegrate Olympic players with their club teams. Playoffs follow, all wrapping up by Sept. 8.

Thoughts?

9 thoughts on “Tinkering with the 2012 WPS calendar

  1. Nice rundown of options. My take:

    Option 1-Loses any advantage that might be gained by Olympic bump. Starts too early, ends too early. What are fans supposed to do from June 2012 to April 2013?

    Option 2- Asks Olympic players once again to rush back. I’d grudgingly accept as compromise.

    Option 3- As a fan I favor this option. I would get the maximum exposure to all the players on my team. The players wouldn’t be so stressed and I’d be over the moon to see friendlies played during the Olympic break.

  2. I would side with Option 2, with a 2 week break. I’m so hesitant to put #WPS games up against college football. People in general and sports fans in particular will be all sportified after the Olympics (I’m sure there is plenty of evidence to support this; that’s why there’s a word for it, right? 😀 ) and there WPS will be to help fill the void. Take advantage of the bump, but don’t get lost in the NCAAFB crush.

    And I think friendlies against W-League/WPSL/College teams during an Olympic break are a fantastic idea.

  3. I agree with Deegley but #2 will probably happen. I wonder how many of the players have college coaching or other commitments in the Fall too…is it really that many?

  4. I kind of like something close to option 1.We have to figure it out as a group and then play real close attention to what the federation and WNT want to do.At the end of the day,we have to be subservient to the WNT.I am a very strong believer that what is best for the WNT and it’s players,is best for soccer and our league.I also believe we shouldnt play one game in the WPS without our WNT players and see no reason why we cant schedule it this way.This would be the best thing for our fans and team consistency.I personally don’t like to put on anything but the best show we can.That being said,I am willing to listen.I also want to congratulate WNY for not only winning the championship,but for setting the model for how a team should be run.Well done.

  5. Yeah! Dan found the spellcheck feature…”subservient” & “believe” Wow, impressive! I’m sure with a little more coaching he’ll find the spacebar next!

    (psst. It’s the long key at the bottom Dan….)

    As for the “options”….I’ll take #3 please.

  6. As I fan I like option 3. I agree we shouldn’t have a game played without the WNT players. They are what is driving the league. The none WNT players are known only to the hard core fans such as myself.

    I have 2 problems with option 1. First of all, the length of the off season. If it goes anything like this year, the Olympics will peak the interest again and there will be no soccer for 8 months. A big climax followed by a silent thud. For that I believe there needs to be post-Olympic games. If there was another southern team, maybe they could run a “developmental” league after the Olympics where they run 2 division (North and South) to cut down on traveling while giving younger players a shot to develop and work with WPS coaches. Please remember these are the ramblings of a fan and I may not be looking at all the angles that the league has to contend with, but it is just a thought.

    My second problem with option 1 is when I look at the fans at games. They are mainly pre-teen girls. They have school. Schools in my area do not get out of class until May. Leaving only a month that parents might allow them to go to games. The games would HAVE to be all weekend games to minimize this affect on attendance but at this point, the league needs to cater to that demographic while it taps into others.

    I wish I had the answers to help the league because I adore it and I hope the owners can come up with a compromise that works for most. It might help is the US Soccer Fed would help a bit more.

  7. quick question is that really dan borislow up there cuz if it is no offense you wont have a team next year unless wps is really desparate which it doesnt sound like they are

    ummmm…
    personally option 3 sounds best for me and the league cuz you need the players to get fans and attendance should sky rocket if usa gives a good performance but there are two fears
    A. football gets in the way of the fans
    B. because its the olympics and there are so many sports, it wont catch on as much

    option 1 and 2 though sound like the combination for an extinct league so it will be tough, but if they play it right such as option 3 they will make enough money for to survive through 2014.

Leave a reply to Dan Borislow Cancel reply