Cricket player aims to make soccer club farewell pay off

Ellyse Perry has represented Australia in cricket and soccer. But to play for Australia in the World Twenty20, she had to say goodbye to her soccer club, Canberra United.

A few months later, she found a new club, Sydney FC. But before then, she has some business in Sri Lanka.

Perry gave up six runs per over in Australia’s World Twenty20 opener as her team won handily over India.


Facts that journalists should consider in racism accusations

We have an AP story today about an aboriginal runner, John Steffensen, who claims he’s the victim of racism in Olympic selection. Steffensen is threatening to boycott the Olympics, in which he has a relay spot, because Australia gave an individual spot to Steve Solomon.

Being the good Midnight Oil fan that I am, I tend to sympathize with Australia’s aboriginal population. But track and field is one of those sports that has objective data that lets us evaluate these claims. They’re called “qualifying standards” and “times.”

Here’s what AP has to say about it — “Solomon, who also achieved an Olympic qualifying time.”

And that’s it.

Journalists have to do more than this. Looking up times and qualification criteria is a simple matter. You can even start at Wikipedia to get a general sense of things and then verify the information therein. (Before pedantic folks cry foul at “Wikipedia,” please note the phrase “verify the information therein.” Wikipedia is a good starting point, and it often links to the sources you need.)

So let’s do it.

The men’s standards for the men’s 400 meters are: 45.30 for the A standard, 45.90 for the B standard.

What do the A and B standards mean? Check the IAAF explanation. Basically, countries can enter up to three athletes in each event if they’ve all achieved the A standard. The B standard is basically a backup plan so that countries that don’t have A-standard athletes can still get someone (one!) in the race.

Let’s look at the times for the people in question for the time period in question:

2011: Solomon 45.58, Steffensen 46.10

2012: Solomon 45.52, Steffensen 45.61

So if we’re going strictly on times, which AP didn’t mention in the story, Steffensen has no case. And in his Twitter feed, he doesn’t make much of a case, either. He veers back and forth between claiming racism and then claiming that he’s not claiming racism. (One error: “Anyways the boys pr is my seasons best!!” No, Solomon beat Steffensen’s 2012 best in 2011 AND 2012.)

Let’s check the Australian media.

Now it becomes trickier. It seems Steffensen did indeed beat Solomon in a trial back in March. And then Steffensen suffered a hamstring injury.

Are the trials supposed to be the sole determining factor if you have two or more athletes meeting the B standard but not the A? The federation gave itself some wiggle room here at the top of page 2 in its official nomination criteria (not the separate documents saying “We will have nomination criteria” or “Yes, we really have nomination criteria“), saying athletes can be chosen based on their World Championships performance, their performance at trials or at the “discretion of the Selectors.”

The criteria could be clearer, and Steffensen’s case is at its strongest when he says it’s about transparency. (It’s a little shakier when he says, “Hey, neither of us had the A! Why should either of us run?”) Fellow 400-meter Sean Wroe backs Steffensen based on his win at trials.

But based on available information, which seems more likely?

A. Athletics Australia has issues with aboriginals.

B. Athletics Australia is really impressed with a young phenom who has posted the fastest times by an Australian in each of the past two years.

Perhaps there’s more to the case that Steffensen could make. But maybe journalists should be asking. At the very least, the facts need to be out there.

Steffensen won the trial. Solomon has the faster times. That’s not in dispute. And journalists need to include those facts before racing with the “racism” headline.

Explaining the World Cup vote using ‘NewsRadio’

Having failed in my effort to explain the World Cup vote using When Harry Met Sally, I’ll now explain it using a scene from NewsRadio in which Dave (Dave Foley) is England, the USA and Australia, while Bill (Phil Hartman) is every FIFA voter who claimed to be voting for said countries.

In this episode, all employees secretly told Dave they were voting for him as news director. The results: Lisa (Maura Tierney) won a unanimous vote.

Bill: Lisa and you were both strong candidates. There was really no way to choose between you two.
Dave: Then why did every single person vote against me?
Bill: Joe voted using a random number generator. Beth voted against you because Lisa gets fewer phone calls and doesn’t like coffee. Matthew is a lifelong Republican, so he had no choice.
Dave: And why didn’t you vote for me?
Bill: I still think I did. I guess this is one of those things we’ll never know the full truth.

You can also watch the non-embeddable video or get the Season 4 DVD, which is probably the best of the show’s excellent run.

Virtual Viewing Party: Sunday’s games

We’re going to keep this room open all day for people to stop by and chat in case Twitter’s down. During the day, you’ll see some Twitter highlights pop through.

Our hosts are:

Algeria-Slovenia, 7:30 a.m. ET, ESPN
Serbia-Ghana, 10 a.m. ET, ESPN
Germany-Australia, 2:30 p.m. ET, ABC
(all on ESPN Deportes / / Univision)

[iframe 500 600]

Live: USA-Australia

Watch the USA-Australia friendly with us — or, if you’re stuck somewhere and can’t watch, follow the action with us. This is basically a test run for the World Cup, when I’m tentatively planning to have a discussion like this for every game. Your hosts today are Beau Dure and Atlanta Journal-Constitution writer Doug Roberson. During the Cup, the plan is to rotate hosts. Readers, of course, can join us and chime in at any time.

By U.S. Soccer mandate, we’re obliged to tell you that the game will be broadcast live on ESPN2 at 8:30 a.m. ET.

Click here and make sure your pop-up blocker isn’t on