women's soccer

Steffi Jones’ homecoming, anthem update, other notes from RFK

German women’s coach Steffi Jones has every reason to be pleased tonight. Her team took an impressive 1-0 win over England, and she did it in her old home stadium from her Washington Freedom days.

“That was about 14 years ago, but I was still feeling home,” Jones said. “I remember so many great games here, the great fans. I was feeling good coming back. I know it’s going to be a new stadium coming, so me being in here one more time is a good, good feeling, yes.”

She was too polite to mention that the place looks like it’s about to fall down. A few newcomers to the RFK Stadium pressbox have been looking around in disbelief.  And the cookies and brownies in the hospitality room have disappeared.

But a good crowd has filed in here, despite the threat of rain. Sunil Gulati is here. So is Abby Wambach.

This is probably my last trip to the pressbox, so it’s a little sentimental for me, too.  So many memories of incomprehensible PA announcements, nachos and bad weather. And great soccer.

One note from the lineup: Former Spirit players Ashlyn Harris, Ali Krieger and Crystal Dunn are NOT in the starting lineup. You could say Jill Ellis is a spoilsport, or you could say she simply cares more about developing her team than anything else.

And … it’s pouring again. This stadium always makes it interesting.

Thoughts on the game at some point tomorrow and later this week.

UPDATE: I also got a little bit more information about the national anthem policy (NOT BYLAW) and why it was not included in the “book” that’s released before the Annual General Meeting. The quick answer: Not enough time. Items from the February board meeting simply couldn’t be added to the book. (You might argue that they still could’ve sent out an addendum, of course.)

I was also told the when the policy appeared on screen at the AGM, the crowd of state and association reps from all over erupted with a loud cheer. Take that for what it’s worth or whatever you want to make of it.

soccer

A partial clarification on the U.S. Soccer anthem policy (not bylaw)

“Why didn’t we know about this national anthem bylaw before U.S. Soccer voted to approve it yesterday?”

First up: It’s not a bylaw. It’s a policy. One big difference between the two is that bylaws — such as the one approved yesterday setting term limits on the president and vice president — don’t exist until they go before the National Council says yea or nay at the Annual General Meeting. See duties (2), (8) and (9) here, from the bylaws:

national-council

Bylaw discussions have been surprisingly contentious in past years, even if the bylaw is something along the lines of “rename the Audit Committee to the Audit and Compliance Committee.” (That’s not a real one, but if you go back through the transcripts, you’ll find something close. And you can see all those transcripts, along with the bylaws and policies, on the U.S. Soccer site. In fact, let’s look at how picayune these bylaw changes can be, while also taking a look at who’s included in the National Council. It’s not just the bigwigs. This is from this year’s book with the AGM agenda, showing some proposed changes …)

council-members

Policies are set by the Board of Directors (bigwigs) throughout the year, and they’re often things that can’t wait until the next AGM. Last year, it was the new Open Cup policy banning teams whose rosters are controlled by a higher-division team (in other words, USL or NPSL teams that are literal or de facto reserve teams for MLS or NASL clubs can’t play). The National Council, as you see above, can either affirm these policy decisions or reject them.

In the case of the national anthem, the National Council was affirming a policy set at a February board meeting. The minutes for that meeting are not yet posted.

But I was still kicking myself a little when I saw the uproar over the national anthem policy (again — not bylaw). I read the whole AGM book as part of the three months of research that went into this Guardian story. I managed to spot a bylaw amendment (as part of a general overhaul, not a separate vote like the term-limit bylaw) that would remove the Hall of Fame and Society for American Soccer History as U.S. Soccer historian. I alerted the unofficial membership of the Society for American Soccer History, which includes people who worked for the Hall of Fame, and they seemed a bit alarmed. But no one made the case that the vestigial Hall staff or the ad hoc Society (I’m one of two people to attend our last two meetings) had actually been serving as U.S. Soccer historian in recent years. So I still don’t know what it means, and I’m … digressing. Back to the point …

As it turns out, the national anthem policy was not in the AGM book. (Unless I’m reading over it, and unless my PDF reader’s search function is broken.) I still have a vague memory of reading about the anthem policy, but I simply can’t find any such reference now.

The only source we have for this is Stuart Holden’s Twitter account. I’m not supposed to be on Twitter until Easter, but I did check out his timeline to see if he mentioned anything about the discussion or the vote. He did not.

So I guess I’ll have to get in touch with some people who were at the AGM in Hawaii. I’ll start calling and emailing on Monday when they’ve flown back to the mainland.

If you were there or can shed some light on this, please let me know.

Meanwhile, please don’t overlook the fact that Val Ackerman is now on the board. Or that the term limits mean it’s “put up or shut up” time for people who want to steer U.S. Soccer a little differently. Maybe start by glancing at the bylaws and trying to figure out how the federation works, because I’m starting to think Sunil Gulati and a few staffers in Chicago are the only people who know — and that’s our fault, not theirs.

soccer

U.S. Soccer approves term limits, elects Val Ackerman

No surprises today in Hawaii — the U.S. Soccer general membership approved term limits for board members, with the president now limited to three four-year terms.

Also, they’ve added former WNBA president, former USA Basketball president and current Big East commissioner Val Ackerman to the board as an independent director.

That’s a big deal for women’s sports fans. I’m not sure who would have a better combination of general sports and women’s sports experience on her resume.

It’s still a very male board — just three of the 15 voting members are women. Ackerman joins Donna Shalala, a fellow independent director, and Cindy Cone of the Athletes’ Council.

I’ll link to the press release when I see it online (for now, it’s just in my mailbox). And don’t forget to read my story on U.S. Soccer to put all this in context. Basically, if you want change, now’s a very good time to speak up.

soccer, work portfolio

MLS 2017 power rankings: Median, mean and ???

I’ve compiled power rankings / predictions / odds from several sources and presented them below in order of median. I chose to emphasize the median over the mean to diminish the influence of the rogue picker. But you can also see the mean as well as the standard deviation as a measure of how much disagreement the pundits have for each team.

Rankings are from FiftyFiveOne, Matt Doyle (MLSSoccer.com), Nate Scott (Fox), ESPN FC, SI, SBI/USA TODAY and Bovada.

 

 

pro soccer

About this story: How this weekend could shape US Soccer's long-term future

Reminder: I’m off Twitter for a while aside from automated stuff like this. And the next one. And the next one. So if you want to chat with me about this story, why not chat here?

And this one has a bit of a back story, anyway. I’ve been working on this for months. One reason it took so much time is the staggering number of documents I read — financial reports, transcripts from annual general meetings (“Alabama … here … Alaska … here … OK, now the adult associations … Alabama … Alabama … Alaska … here …”) and so on.

Another reason might surprise you: A lot of people weren’t interested in talking. But I didn’t sense that they felt intimidated. They simply didn’t know anything.

I’m grateful that they admitted it. They’re not the Twitter pundits who think they have all the answers on reforming U.S. Soccer but have never even peeked at any of the information the federation puts online. A couple of people had nothing to add to this story but were looking forward to seeing it published.

So there’s a “put up or shut up” element to this story. Sure. If you really want to see some new people in charge, speak up now and over the next four years, because a lot of people may soon be term-limited off the board.

But I also hope it gives people a bit of a peek behind the curtain. Sure, anyone can read the same documents I did and maybe even talk to some of the same people I did, but it takes some time. If you understand U.S. Soccer a little better after reading this, I’ve done my job.

And if you have anything to add now, please do.

It’s an exciting time for soccer. The sport’s profile in this country has completely changed in the past 15 years. So what’s next?

Story: How this weekend could shape US Soccer’s long-term future | Football | The Guardian

ranting soccer dad, soccer, work portfolio

About this story: How this weekend could shape US Soccer’s long-term future

Reminder: I’m off Twitter for a while aside from automated stuff like this. And the next one. And the next one. So if you want to chat with me about this story, why not chat here?

And this one has a bit of a back story, anyway. I’ve been working on this for months. One reason it took so much time is the staggering number of documents I read — financial reports, transcripts from annual general meetings (“Alabama … here … Alaska … here … OK, now the adult associations … Alabama … Alabama … Alaska … here …”) and so on.

Another reason might surprise you: A lot of people weren’t interested in talking. But I didn’t sense that they felt intimidated. They simply didn’t know anything.

I’m grateful that they admitted it. They’re not the Twitter pundits who think they have all the answers on reforming U.S. Soccer but have never even peeked at any of the information the federation puts online. A couple of people had nothing to add to this story but were looking forward to seeing it published.

So there’s a “put up or shut up” element to this story. Sure. If you really want to see some new people in charge, speak up now and over the next four years, because a lot of people may soon be term-limited off the board.

But I also hope it gives people a bit of a peek behind the curtain. Sure, anyone can read the same documents I did and maybe even talk to some of the same people I did, but it takes some time. If you understand U.S. Soccer a little better after reading this, I’ve done my job.

And if you have anything to add now, please do.

It’s an exciting time for soccer. The sport’s profile in this country has completely changed in the past 15 years. So what’s next?

Story: How this weekend could shape US Soccer’s long-term future | Football | The Guardian