mma

Covering MMA: Fascinating, frustrating, never dull

One of my projects for this year is to wrap up a book on my experiences covering mixed martial arts. I promise it’ll be a fun read.

So I was happy to see SI’s terrific media reporter, Richard Deitsch, hosting a roundtable of MMA journalists. He got a good cross-section — people are very much “in” the UFC orbit (Heidi Fang, Ariel Helwani) and those who are “out” (Josh Gross).

IMG00507-20100827-2108
Boxer James Toney, soaking up attention in a Boston hotel lobby before his lone UFC fight.

It’s a unique environment. I’ve never covered another sport that handed out copies of Playboy featuring an employee. I’ve rarely found athletes in other sports who’ll just chat, though that’s largely a function of having media and athletes in the same hotels.

I’ve also rarely seen qualified journalists — in some cases, the best in the sport — denied credentials for obviously petty reasons. And I hated that. Not only did it strike me as unfair, but it gave readers the impression that those of us who were “in” had sold our souls and agreed not to say anything negative about the UFC.

So it was refreshing to see this roundtable address that issue and a lot of other things that you’ll see in my book whenever I get around to finishing it.

In order of appearance in the roundtable:

Fans on press row, real journalists not: Fang mentions this in her first answer, and she’s right. To an extent, it’s simply a function of having reporters who didn’t go through the dues-paying you get at a local newspaper. I experienced the same thing when I was courtside at the ACC basketball tournament in the late 90s alongside a couple of kids fresh out of college working for a new whiz-bang website, cheering for N.C. State over Duke while I swallowed my tongue.

Helwani says every reporter working for a credible outlet should be credentialed. And that’s something Kevin Iole and others get into as well later in the roundtable.

Media access: Fighters are, for the most part, quite accessible. I interviewed Tom Lawlor while he was going in and out of the sauna to cut weight. Randy Couture saved a seat for me in the stands backstage at a weigh-in so we could do our interview. Kimbo Slice teased me in a small-group interview, which was hilarious.

Helwani raises a good point — fighters only compete 2-4 times per year, so it’s not like they’re doing locker-room interviews 100 times a year. There’s no time for familiarity to breed contempt.

Some are more private than others. I needed a bit of back-and-forth through PR reps to get a phone interview with Brock Lesnar, and he called me from a number that came up as “Private Number” on my called ID. But the interview was just fine.

Rampage Jackson is another story.

Dana White access: Helwani points out the UFC boss isn’t as accessible today as he was a few years ago, back when I was on the beat. When I was at USA TODAY, he’d chat with me regularly. He has withdrawn over the years, to the point of actually not being present at some press conferences. I think it’s a function of rapid UFC expansion — they put on so many fights each year now, and he can’t be everywhere.

Social media: Some of the nastiest stuff I’ve ever read has been directed at female MMA journalists. The MMA fan base is generally more civil than you’d think from afar, but Twitter gives the idiots a platform.

Of course, I’ve been threatened by Alex Morgan fans, so perhaps it’s not unique to MMA. But I don’t want to trivialize the abuse female journalists have received, on Twitter and on message boards. Some people need Royce Gracie to knee them in a place where it used to be legal.

Will your job exist in 20 years?: I don’t know. I think writing jobs are going to decline. Multimedia jobs are safer. And organizations are likely to demand more control.

The roundtable is a good read, with good thoughtful people. Enjoy.

olympic sports

Important Olympic qualifying dates

Yes, I’m still planning to do Olympic projections this year. I’m switching to a different system, though, and the projections won’t be up until early summer.

In preparing for that, I compiled a massive list of dates that will determine which Americans go to Rio to compete. That means I had to read every available “selection criteria” document, which is an easy way to get a headache.

I don’t expect this post to go viral, but I figured it was worth sharing for Oly-philes. Enjoy.

Feb. 7-14: Sailing, 49er/49erFX/Nacra World Championships (U.S. qual)

Feb. 13: Track and field, USA marathon trial (U.S. qual)

Feb. 19-24: Diving, World Cup (quota)

Feb. 21: Track and field, 50k race walk (U.S. qual)

Feb. 26-March 5: Sailing, Laser Radial Europeans (U.S. qual)

March 2-6: Cycling (track), World Champs, then final ranking list (quota/direct qual)

March 2-6: Synchronized swimming, qualification tournament (quota/direct qual)

March 4-6: Wrestling, Pan Am qualifier (quota)

March 5-12: Sailing, Finn Europeans (U.S. qual)

March 8-20: Boxing, Americas qualifier (quota/direct qual)

March 10-11: Taekwondo, Pan Am qualifier (quota/direct qual)

March 21-28: Water polo, women’s qualification tournament (quota)

March 26-April 2: Sailing, Laser/RS:X event (U.S. qual)

April 1-8: Shooting, rifle/pistol trials (U.S. qual)

April 4: Fencing, ranking cutoff date (quota/direct qual)

April 5-12: Sailing, 470 Europeans (U.S. qual)

April 8-9: Canoe/kayak (slalom), trials 1 (U.S. qual part 1)

April 8-10: Table tennis, North American qualifier (quota/direct qual)

April 9-10: Wrestling, U.S. trials (U.S. qual)

April 12: Fencing, U.S. ranking cutoff (U.S. qual)

April 15-17: Fencing, zonal last-chance qualifier (quota/direct qual)

April 16-24: Gymnastics (trampoline), Olympic Test Event (quota)

April 17-24: Rowing, U.S. small boat trials (U.S. qual)

April 22-24: Wrestling, world qualification tournament (quota/direct qual)

April 29: Modern pentathlon, World Cup Final in Sarasota (misc interest/points)

April 29-30: Canoe/kayak (sprint), trials (U.S. qual)

May 5: Badminton, final ranking list (quota/direct qual)

May 6-8: Wrestling, world qualification tournament (quota/direct qual)

May 7-8: Canoe/kayak (slalom), trials 2 (U.S. qual final – points system)

May 13-22: Boxing, APB/WSB qualifier (quota/direct qual)

May 15: Table tennis, ranking cutoff (quota)

May 15: Triathlon, ranking cutoff (quota/direct qual)

May 16-25: Shooting, shotgun trials (U.S. qual)

May 17-23: Modern pentathlon, World Championships (quota/direct qual)

May 19-20: Canoe/kayak (sprint), Pan Am qualifier (quota/direct qual?)

May 19-27: Boxing, women’s qualifier (quota/direct qual)

May 22-25: Rowing, qualification regatta (quota)

May 27-29: Rowing, World Cup (U.S. qual)

May 25: Cycling (mountain bike), final ranking list (quota)

May 25-29, Cycling (BMX), World Championships (quota/direct qual)

May 26: Cycling (road), women’s Pan Am qualifier (quota)

May 30: Judo, ranking cutoff date (quota/direct qual)

May 31: Cycling (road), women’s ranking cutoff date (quota/U.S. qual)

May 31: Cycling (BMX), ranking cutoff date (quota)

June 1: Cycling (BMX), U.S. ranking cutoff date (U.S. qual)

June 1: Modern pentathlon, ranking cutoff date (quota/direct qual with asterisks)

June 4-11: Weightlifting, Pan Am qualifier (quota)

June 6: Tennis, ranking cutoff date (quota/direct qual)

June 8-13: Gymnastics (rhythmic/trampoline), U.S. trials if needed (U.S. qual)

June 11: Cycling (BMX), last-chance men’s qualifier (U.S. qual)

June 13: Volleyball (beach), ranking cutoff (quota/direct qual)

June 13-18: Archery, World Cup (women’s quota)

June 18-26: Diving, U.S. trials (U.S. qual)

June 19-22: Rowing, final trials (U.S. qual)

June 20: Cycling (road), men’s ranking cutoff date (quota/U.S. qual)

June 20: Weightlifting, ranking cutoff (quota/U.S. qual)

June 20-26: Volleyball (beach), last-chance qualifier (quota/direct qual)

June 23-26: Gymnastics (artistic), U.S. men’s trials (U.S. qual)

June 26-July 3: Swimming, U.S. trials (U.S. qual)

June 27: Field hockey, U.S. women’s team named (U.S. qual)

July 1-5: Equestrian, team named (U.S. qual)

July 1-10: Track and field, U.S. trials (U.S. qual)

July 8-10: Gymnastics (artistic), U.S. women’s trials (U.S. qual)

July 11: Golf, ranking cutoff date (quota/direct qual)

July 17: Rugby, U.S. teams named (U.S. qual)

July 17: Volleyball, U.S. teams named (U.S. qual)

winter sports

Curling controversy swirls at nationals

I’ve been writing about U.S. Soccer’s efforts to cultivate elite play even if it means breaking up teams and long-established ways of organizing competition. Turns out there’s a similar story in curling.

Part of the issue: The High Performance program, which takes top players and forms teams under a national-team staff. Another part of the issue: The World Championship berths at stake are decided by a convoluted points system that robs the national championship of some of its suspense.

And so some people on the CurlingZone forums are a bit cynical about the big event going on in Jacksonville this week. Between the lack of a shot at the World Championships and the travel to Florida, the women’s tournament only has seven teams. One blogger offers a really cynical take — and please bear in mind I haven’t fact-checked his accusations, though I can verify that the Jacksonville crowd is bigger than “tens.”

But it’s easy to understand what USA Curling is trying to do. You could argue, perhaps, that the High Performance program should be team-based rather than based on individuals. The two top teams, John Shuster’s and Erika Brown’s, weren’t formed through tryouts. (Shuster is now in the HP program; Brown is not.)

The points system debate is shakier. Should one team represent the USA just because it got hot one week or figured out the ice in an unfamiliar venue? I’m inclined to say no.

The first couple of days of the championships saw another controversy. In the showdown between Alex Leichter and Heath McCormick, someone threw popcorn on the ice. Curling is largely self-officiated, but in this case, they needed to call in officials to decide whether a do-over was in order. It was not. But people kept their sense of humor.

So how are the championships going?

The women’s competition has had few surprises. Brown’s team and the three High Performance teams, including the juniors led by Cory Christensen, are a level above the other three teams. Jamie Sinclair beat Brown’s team in the only result I’d call an upset.

The absences hurt. The top four teams are all in the top 50 in the Order of Merit. The other skips in the top 100 — Alexandra Carlson, Patti Lank and Courtney George — are not at nationals. The next highest-ranked skip is Abigayle Lindgren at 169. The Order of Merit rankings don’t tell all — they reward teams that play a lot of tournaments with points on the line — but that’s a big gap.

The men’s competition is less predictable. Here’s how I ranked the teams coming into the tournament, with Order of Merit rankings in parentheses:

  1. John Shuster (14)
  2. Craig Brown (24)
  3. Brady Clark (50)
  4. Pete Fenson (44)
  5. Todd Birr (90)
  6. Korey Dropkin (105)
  7. Alex Leichter (123)
  8. Heath McCormick (77)
  9. Brandon Corbett (109)
  10. Hunter Clawson (194)

But who’s undefeated through five games? Brady Clark, who is not in the HP program but has beaten Shuster and Fenson. Then we have four teams at 3-2, including three HP teams (Shuster, Brown, Dropkin) and Clawson. Torino Olympic medalist Fenson opened with a win against Leichter but dropped the next four games.

Yesterday evening’s draw was full of upsets. Leichter beat Brown. Clawson beat Fenson. Dropkin (the HP junior team) beat Shuster. And though they’re close in my rankings, a lot of people would be surprised to see Corbett beat former national champion McCormick.

That’s certainly enough to keep things interesting. Whatever your opinion of the programs, this is a national championship worth watching on its own merits. And yes, it’s live-streamed. Enjoy.