soccer

A few honest words with NWSL executive director Cheryl Bailey

I had a chance to speak with Cheryl Bailey for a few minutes during the Thorns-Spirit game, and we ran through a quick series of topics:

– Scheduling around FIFA dates: The season is just too short. They tried to minimize the impact this year and will re-evaluate next year.

– Attendance: Even moreso than the numbers, Bailey is impressed with the environments at the games she has attended. She has seen different stadiums — big, little, neighborhood, suburban — and has enjoyed the variety of experiences they’re providing.

– Marketing: Veterans of BigSoccer and beyond will appreciate this exchange, which also gave Bailey a good laugh (nice to know the NWSL boss has a sense of humor):

ME: Will we see more of a marketing push for NWSL as the season goes on?

BAILEY: In terms of …?

ME: (Pause). I don’t know. I never know what “marketing” really means. Every time there’s an argument about soccer for the last 20 years online — and I’ve been online for 20 years, I’ve seen every argument there is about soccer — it’s just, “Oh, if it were just marketed more, people would come out.” So I have to ask …

BAILEY: I think since it’s so new, it’s not something everyone automatically knows about. It’s new, it’s starting, it’s growing. Just the fact that it’s on YouTube — all the games are live. The last six weeks of the season, it will be on Fox. It’s a gradual transition. But that, I think, is what’s going to give us stability. So in that respect, marketing, getting the word out — we’re using a lot of the social media that wasn’t there before. That’s what people are responding to these days. In a short amount of time, how do you get the word. It’ll grow, and the marketing will grow from there.

– Contracts: Are most NWSL players signed for one-year deals?

BAILEY: There’s an option at the end of this year.

ME: So teams should be able to keep their players together?

BAILEY: If they choose, yes.

Good news for the Spirit, which should be a better team in 2014 than it is right now.

(Corrected: She said “using a lot of the social media.” Not “losing,” which would be very different.)

soccer

Washington Spirit vs. Portland: The real deal

I had a lot of fun tonight on Twitter at the expense of the fans and the ref fawning over Alex Morgan tonight at the SoccerPlex, where attendance was one starting lineup north of 5,000.

But the takeaway from tonight’s game is this: The Portland Thorns aren’t just hype. They’re great.

All the preseason attention went to the star-studded attack allocations — Alex Morgan and Christine Sinclair. They showed their skills, with Sinclair fully capable of being a playmaker as well as a target player.

Get past them, and you run into WPS/PSG veteran Allie Long in midfield. Then you hit former U.S. U-20 captain and two-time WPS champion Becky Edwards. Attack the wing, and you run into former U.S. defender Marian (Dalmy) Dougherty. Go up the center, and who’s that making the recovery and clearing the danger? Just national teamer Rachel Buehler.

And you have Nikki Washington, who scored the game-winner in the Thorns’ 2-1 win with a terrific far-post shot after Washington’s Ali Krieger coughed up the ball.

Even the relative unknown — Meleana Shim — played a terrific game Saturday night.

That’s just not fair.

You can’t hand the NWSL trophy to Portland just yet. Kansas City matched up well with them in the season opener. On a given day, Sky Blue or Western New York could give them a run. Maybe Boston, too.

The Spirit made a game of it. The home side (yes, Alex Morgan fanboys — Washington was the home side) had seven shots on goal to Portland’s five. Portland’s opening goal was a penalty kick awarded dubiously after Morgan seemed to be offside, was barely fouled and may or may not have been in the box. Ashlyn Harris was sufficiently incensed by the call to get a yellow card for dissent for her protests before and after the PK.

Fans will be happy to know Harris and Morgan hugged it out in the SoccerPlex’s main building after the game. The Thorns were gracious winners all the way around. When asked if the Thorns did anything to slow down Washington’s all-world midfielder Diana Matheson, coach Cindy Parlow Cone (can we just call her CPC from now on?) said, “I don’t know if there’s anything to slow down that girl. She’s all over the field.”

CPC also singled out the Spirit defense and holding midfield. By name. She listed everyone and apologized for not being able to come up with Domenica Hodak’s name, even though Hodak was making her first start. Quite a change from her old coach, Anson Dorrance, who refers to people as “that girl who used to score a lot against us” or “that other girl who used to give us a tough time” or “that tall girl.”

She might be a rookie coach, but CPC is an early front-runner for coach of the year. She says the right things, she’s intense at the right times, and this team is tactically sound.

And she believes firmly that, despite her team’s unbeaten record, the NWSL is a league of parity. “With only eight teams, every team is really good, and the Spirit is no exception. We were lucky to get out of there with the win.”

Lucky to get the PK call, maybe, and perhaps lucky that Krieger had an off night with a costly turnover. But the Thorns are surely a bit farther along in their development than the youthful Spirit.

Washington coach Mike Jorden sees the work to be done. He made the crowd-pleasing move of starting Caroline Miller ahead of Tiffany McCarty, but Miller was just as tentative as McCarty has been.

Jorden has plenty of options up front, but as my D.C. media buddy Aaron Stollar pointed out tonight, he doesn’t have that one player that requires constant attention from the defense. The Spirit has been most effective with players like Matheson, Stephanie Ochs and Lori Lindsey drifting into the attack. If Miller or McCarty can develop into that dangerous forward, the Spirit will be much better off.

On defense, Candace Chapman was once again on the bench despite pregame claims that she was available to play. But Tori Huster is growing into that center back role. After a strong performance against Abby Wambach and a more difficult time against Sky Blue last week, she had a terrific game against the big-name Thorns offense, making a few timely interceptions and generally minimizing the threats. Ashlyn Harris made one big save, but that was on a long-range Christine Sinclair shot.

Morgan had a few words with Domenica Hodak after a mild foul, then a few more with Diana Matheson after an even milder foul. She just shrugged it off as getting fiesty. “As players, we know that we need to put a good product on the field. We don’t get paid to go out there and fight, we get paid to go out there and play.”

Matheson’s late PK goal was just what the game needed, just enough to remind the crowd that the home team is worth supporting even when someone with nice hair isn’t on the visiting team. The big crowd, packing the SoccerPlex’s stands and the hill with the beer garden, deserved some late drama.

I’ve been insisting that you can’t write Washington’s name in Sharpie at the bottom of the table. I still believe that, especially after Boston’s demolition of Chicago today. They’re still due another couple of players — Chapman, Mexican midfielder Teresa Worbis, and an unnamed Europe-based defender. But it’s also a matter of confidence. The sooner the Spirit get that first win, the better they’ll be.

Until then, Washington fans should just take heart that they’re seeing some good games in a great facility. Enjoy.

soccer

Women’s soccer moves, trans-Atlantic comparison

This Women’s Super League argument in England is a little confusing:

– Nottingham Forest, which was relegated from the English pyramid’s second tier to the third last season, applied to be in the league in 2014 but was rejected.

– Notts County, Forest’s local rival, bid for a spot and was accepted.

– But the Notts County chairman is actually relocating an existing Super League team, Lincoln Ladies, to play at Notts County.

Nottingham Forest isn’t happy that a team from outside Nottinghamshire is moving into its space. And Lincoln Ladies fans are annoyed that the pride of Lincolnshire is moving away.

It’s not just a question of distance. The mileage between Notts County’s ground and Lincoln Ladies’ current home is 35.3 miles. The shortest drive from RFK Stadium (Washington Freedom 2001-03) to the Maryland SoccerPlex (Washington Freedom 2004-10, D.C. United Women 2011-12, Washington Spirit 2013-) is 40.1 miles.

But it’s also just 34.6 miles from RFK Stadium to Baltimore’s M&T Bank Stadium. Ask United or Spirit fans how they’d feel about that.

So it’s not just about driving distance. It’s about identity. And it’s stunning to see the English powers-that-be signing off on a move that ruins two identities at one swoop.

sports culture

NCAAmageddon and the numbers

The NCAA has released updated numbers on how much money is being flushed down the pipes at your local athletic department, and Sports Law Blog relates it to the sure-to-be-landmark O’Bannon vs. NCAA case.

I think O’Bannon has a case that shouldn’t hinge on such things. The initial argument was whether O’Bannon was entitled to money from his likeness being used in a video game. You’d think a judge could simply say yes, giving athletes a small but substantial victory.

But no, as this SI piece says, a judge instead interpreted “profiting off likeness” to include televised games. I’m no lawyer, but it seems to me that if they win, TV news broadcasts would suddenly be responsible for paying everyone who appears on camera. Welcome back to the age of radio.

Perhaps common sense will prevail, and everyone will make a deal allowing athletes to be paid if their images are being used to sell video games and T-shirts. Or not.

In the meantime, the NCAA numbers once again feed all sorts of arguments, particularly Title IX.

soccer

MLS 2015-18: Future shock

A couple of related topics on Jason Davis’ new-ish American Soccer Morning podcast over the past two weeks:

– NBC has paid eleventy billion dollars to show 45,000 hours of Premier League coverage every week, starting this fall.

– MLS, while doing well on the box office and sponsorship fronts, is struggling to stand out amid the four zillion games on TV every week.

The Shin Guardian this week had a terrific analysis of MLS moneys, pointing out the tiny sliver of league revenue from broadcasting.

Now here’s the kicker:

– The league’s deal with ESPN runs out in 2014.

– The league’s deal with NBC runs out in 2014.

– The league’s deal with Univision runs out in … you guessed it … 2014.

The good news — the league’s deal with major sponsor adidas, which was due to run out the same year, has been extended to 2018.

So MLS, for all its upward momentum over the past eight years, has a couple of major dates upcoming. And surely a stronger TV deal or two would lead to stronger sponsorship down the road.

The big question: How does MLS improve the TV situation?

It’s a question that has nagged MLS throughout its history, and with the proliferation of European soccer on the airwaves, the question is more difficult to answer.

A few simple tweaks may help. Jason talked about the importance of a consistent time for national broadcasts such as the NFL’s four major windows (Sunday: 1, 4 and 8-ish ET, then Monday night). And Jason raised the point of gameday atmosphere (i.e., actual soccer supporters in full voice) contributing to the quality of a broadcast — a typical game in Portland is more fun to watch than a typical Chivas USA game.

Another would be the restoration of an MLS highlights and discussion show. ESPN and Fox each tried one. Now that the league has nine games on a typical weekend, far too many for most people to follow, it’s time to get back in gear. MLSSoccer.com’s “goal timeline” is nice, but some people still prefer their highlight shows to be on actual television, with fewer clicks required.

But does MLS need to take more drastic steps to improve what viewers see on an MLS broadcast? Is it time to break the bank and spend more on players?

Spending has perked up over the last few years. The accusation that MLS limits its clubs holds a lot less water than it used to — a club can spend whatever it wants on a couple of DPs and a youth academy. The salary cap has more loopholes than the corporate tax code.

The trend toward looser wallets may have to continue. The time to address that may be when the MLS collective bargaining agreement expires …

… in 2014.

Anyone else starting to think the expansion talk about a second New York team and Orlando may not be the biggest MLS news in the next 18 months?

 

soccer

The cutthroat world of youth soccer, part 3,489

Two big local soccer stories may be of interest to people beyond Northern Virginia:

1. The VCCL is now the CCL. The idea behind such leagues is that clubs can schedule games in all age groups against other clubs so that a greater sense of club identity is forged. In reality, when one club’s U15 team isn’t up to par with the other clubs’ U15 teams, they recruit heavily from elsewhere to level the playing field. Or they take an entire team from elsewhere.

See the discussion at the generally vile Fairfax Underground (seriously, do NOT read the thread about the Muslim cabbie assault). I think “travel parent” speaks for me. (No, it’s not me.)

2. McLean Youth Soccer is out of the Development Academy. You can some discussion on that story as well as the Fairfax Underground thread, which perked back up with the McLean news.

All of which makes me glad I’ve so far avoided the big-time travel scene. And it makes me feel badly for people whose kids are soccer prodigies.

I recently had a fun conversation about this topic:

ME: Suppose my kid turned out to be the best 12-year-old player in Vienna in a few years.

NOT ME: You’d probably want him to go to one of the big clubs.

Why?

To get the best competition and best coaches.

Why?

So he’d develop.

Into what?

I know — I’m being intentionally obtuse. But I think the race to get to the “best” clubs and the “best” competitions is getting rather silly. Kids who play American football get to play for their high schools against other teams. Kids who play soccer have to shop around to find the right fit, preferably one that won’t cost their parents a ton of money or commuting time.

I get the notion of promotion/relegation to make sure club games aren’t useless, joyless blowouts. In an area with as many good clubs as Northern Virginia, you could certainly have good competition up and down the divisional ladders.

If they’d all play in the same danged league.