soccer

Single-Digit Soccer: Position papers

My first exposure to youth sports was at the Athens (Ga.) YMCA. We played football in the fall (flag in first grade, tackle from second grade on), basketball in the winter, soccer in the early Georgia spring and a brief softball season.

In football, we learned positions right away. I still remember mine — end in one season, guard in another. And I remember the numbering system. The backs were numbered 1 (QB), 2 (left RB), 3 (middle RB), 4 (right RB). Then we numbered holes — even numbers on the right, starting with 2 (between center and right guard), 4 (guard and tackle), 6 (tackle and end), 8 (sweep). Odd numbers on the left. So if the coach called 23 in the huddle, the QB would hand off to the left running back, who would run between the left guard and left tackle. Everyone knew which way to block.

Reminder: We’re talking about second-graders here. And though we moved tentatively and sometimes dropped the ball, we could run all the plays. They even taught us a tricky blocking scheme in which we “pulled” the guard (me) out to block the defensive end. The offensive tackle and end shifted inside to block, leaving a confused defensive end wondering why no one was blocking him. He stood there until I ran into him at full speed. Oh, how the poor kid cried. Not sure we tried that again.

The staff at the Y were all former football players, and in that day, it’s fair to say they didn’t know much about soccer. My guess is they hadn’t gone through an F license workshop or read up on the latest U.S. Soccer training guidelines. So when they put us on the field for soccer, we all got positions. Left back, right mid, goalkeeper. Off you go.

I can’t remember whether the games devolved into “mob-ball” or “magnet-ball” as you see in single-digit soccer today. I mostly remember playing goalkeeper and blaming myself when an easy shot got by. As far as I remember, my defense held its shape pretty well — probably better than it did in the adult league game I played Friday night. (“Geez, why am I running back from right mid again?! Why is our right back drifting all over the place?! My leg hurts!”)

I mention all of this because, according to what we’re taught as single-digit soccer coaches, this is impossible. Kids can’t learn positions or tactics. Don’t worry about “magnet-ball.” It’s OK for now.

Yet we learned them at the Y. The English family on my team says they learned positions at age 5 and have had to adjust to mob-ball in the USA. What’s different about modern U.S. youth soccer?

I’ve read through the new U.S. Soccer curriculum again, and I can’t quite tell whether that mindset has changed. The curriculum says players are supposed to be able to “occupy the original position in a game once an action is finished,” which I’d guess means that we’re supposed to be assigning positions. But the “tactics” space is left blank in the U5-U8 plans.

My hunch is that if we really worked on positions, we’d get them to work. But we get one hour a week of divided attention in which to teach them, and we’re supposed to be working on dribbling drills (without calling them drills) and maybe passing and shooting games.

The Y was different. We were there for two practices a week. And the same coaches who taught us to be a right tackle were there to teach us to be a center midfielder. We got the message. Perhaps with some disciplinary measures that modern parents and psychologists would frown on.

This season, I’ve tried to get my team to spread out at the very least. I took a cartoon approach. I’m telling them we don’t want this:

Let’s have two people back, but not like this:

(The two defenders are sitting back and waving at their teammates at the other end of the field, who are outnumbered 5-to-3.)

The ideal is this:

I’ve certainly seen coaches try to instill positional sense at U6 and U7. Some of them are just good-hearted and trying to do their best. Maybe they got through at some level, though it never showed in the games.

Then there’s the guy I’ve mentioned before who would stop games to tell his team how they could’ve done better on that last goal from a tactical perspective. He’s the same guy who made occasional snide comments at other coaches about their sideline instructions, and he scheduled his team for the first game each Saturday but never assigned himself to set up. While the opposing coach grunted with the portable goals, his team was running actual drills, having been driven to the game 20 minutes early by a gaggle of frightened parents. Then he would get mad at us because our players were running late. (See, parents? See what happens to your poor coach when you don’t show up on time?)

Results don’t matter at this age, but running over that team felt pretty good.

3 thoughts on “Single-Digit Soccer: Position papers

  1. (I follow you through BigSoccer)

    Just because the English learn positions at age 5, doesn’t mean it’s the right thing. But I don’t think it hurts or hinders them. They don’t exactly come to the first practice with zero knowledge of soccer like American kids do.

  2. I think I was the last guy that posted on here too. 🙂

    I won’t come at it from the same perspective, but I’m helping out this coach now and all we do is drills in practice. 1v1 at most for U8/9 and very little to no SSG. The one practice I ran, the kids said out loud (inaccurately), “I can’t believe we scrimmaged the whole time.” We actually played 2v2 > 3v3 > and finished with 4v4.

    Anyway, point is the kids are very lost in our actual games. Besides having skills that are better than opponents, I wouldn’t call it “soccer”. So to your point above, while “positions” may not be the answer, a certain level of organization is necessary.

    Positions are too rigid in soccer terms. Coming full circle, I play 6v6 with a group of adults with a good playing pedigree and we don’t discuss formations or positions. We just go out and we arrange ourselves to the needs of the game—that is what the takeaway should be. It’s more about “positioning” than “positions”—maintaining the positional relationships to teammates, the opponents, the ball, and the goal(s) is what’s really important.

    So assigning “left/center/right forward/midfielder/defender” isn’t really the point—it’s getting them to understand the relationships (maybe “spacing” and “angles”) that is truly needed. Plus, these will vary depending on where we are on the field (which third) and who has the ball.

    American football, is not this complex. We have a static starting point and we reset every few seconds. Soccer is fluid.

    I think saying “don’t teach positions” is inaccurate and misleading, but we do need to start giving them guidelines on where to be at a given moment. Which is a lot akin to teaching a 2nd grader football plays “this is where you should be and this is what you should be doing at this time.” I don’t see how that’s wholly inappropriate.

Leave a reply to Rob Cancel reply