soccer

Announcing the MLS ratings project

Envious of other countries that have Sunday (even Saturday evening) papers filled with player ratings to let you know how everyone performed at a glance, even subjectively? Nostalgic for the days that USA TODAY had ratings for MLS? Tired of poring through 15 different game reports on 15 different sites and blogs that don’t tell you whether your fantasy left back performed semi-capably?

In this day of DIY media, why can’t we do this ourselves?

Here’s the plan: Each week, we need one or two people to volunteer to rate a game. I’m reserving the right to turn people down if I don’t think they’re going to be objective about it, and anyone who comes in and rates every home team player a 10 won’t be considered for ratings down the road. We’re not looking for Fanzone here — we want actual information from people who watched the game in detail.

We also want a little bit more than a number. It could be something like “Donovan: 7 – missed one early chance but sprang Buddle for equalizer with deft touch.” Or “Dure: 2 – repeatedly beaten for pace, most attempted clearances intercepted, at fault on all six goals. Gets a 2 rather than a 1 just for sheer effort and avoidance of yellow card.”

The ratings also should help us track tactical changes each team is making. Lead off the report with any changes in the side since the last game and give us at least a solid guess at the formation. That usually means taking what you see on the broadcast and then giving it a reality check once the game is underway. (Also, this is easier if you’re in the stadium and can see the whole field, so anyone who’s at a game gets priority if we have several volunteers.)

I’ll try one tonight for Metapan-Seattle, though I may be at the mercy of the broadcast feed for CONCACAF games. Hopefully, I’ll at least give us a template to go by.

For now, send in your ratings as comments — I’ll set up a post to collect them. We might change that system down the road.

So, can I have volunteers for the following (times ET; updated with volunteers):

Thursday
8 p.m. – Philadelphia-Columbus (ESPN2) – John “The Soccerist” Greely

Saturday
4 p.m. – Toronto-Chivas USA (Telefutura)
7:30 p.m. – New England-D.C. United
8:30 p.m. – Kansas City-Salt Lake – Alexander Abnos
9 p.m. – Colorado-San Jose

Sunday
7 p.m. – Dallas-Philadelphia (FSC) – Michael Roadarmel
9 p.m. – Chicago-New York (ESPN2) – me
11 p.m. – Seattle-Houston- Alexander Abnos

olympic sports

Women’s ski jumpers: The Phoenix of Olympic sports

If any sport has had a longer road to the Olympics than women’s ski jumping, I don’t know it.

In 2006, the women had every reason to believe they would be included in the Vancouver Games, having received an overwhelming vote of support from FIS, the international ski federation. Then the IOC said no. (See a complete history and an update written from Whistler, where I was one of several journalists to chat with women’s jumper Alissa Johnson when she made the trip to watch her brother compete.)

The reasons given were everything from the bureaucratic (number of competitions falling short of erratically enforced criteria) to the condescending (we’re not sure girls’ bodies can take it). Ski cross, both men’s and women’s, made the cut for 2010, though the number of participants worldwide was fewer than the number of women’s ski jumpers by ski jump advocates’ reckoning. The U.S., which boasts one of the world’s best collection of women’s ski jumpers, sent no women to the 2010 ski cross competition.

Several FIS and IOC bigwigs raised the point that karate and other sports have far more participants have been waiting a long time for Olympic recognition. But that’s a false equivalent. Ski jumping is an Olympic sport. Women’s ski jumping is not. The arguments against adding new sports — new facilities, additional technical staff, etc. — fall apart. Any would-be Winter Olympic host knows it needs ski jump ramps. But the IOC thought nothing of forcing future Summer Games hosts to come up with golf courses.

This summer, the FIS finally granted women’s ski jumping full World Cup status, effective in the 2011-12 season. They’ll also get a team event in the junior world championship. The official reasons for keeping women off the Olympic jumps will be wiped clean.

Here’s the bad news. The U.S. Ski Team isn’t swimming in money right now. U.S. Nordic director John Farra says the organization had to lay off people before the Olympics.

Continue reading